Is it worth it to delay Social Security to provide a larger survivor benefit for your spouse? 

is it worth it to delay social security to provide a larger survivor benefit for your spouse?

Is it worth it to delay Social Security to provide a larger survivor benefit for your spouse? 

No. 
 

I know it sounds smart to leave your spouse a higher benefit than they would receive on their own, but it’s not worth it.  Here’s why.

As previously noted, delaying Social Security carries a break-even period of roughly 11.66 years to 12.5 years. That break-even timeline doesn’t change based on who is collecting — whether it’s you or your surviving spouse, they still have to wait the same amount of time before the delayed benefit actually pays off.

Consider the numbers. If you begin collecting at 70, the break-even point falls beyond the age of 80! That means your spouse would only breakeven on your decision if they live to the year that you (a deceased you) would’ve turned 80.  If they die that year, their rate of return (and yours) would be 0%.  They only start seeing a positive rate of return beyond that year, and again, at that pace, they will be targeting a rate of return between 2.88% – 3.1%.  Had you collected yout Social Security on time, then you can be spending Social Security’s money, and letting your money continue to grow – hopefully outpacing a 2.88% – 3.1% return. 
 

Also, keep in mind, that if your Social Security benefit it higher than your spouse’s, then if you would’ve collecting Social Security earlier, you would’ve unlocked the spousal portion of your benefit which your spouse could’ve collected while you’re alive (assuming your spouse could collect your spousal portion).

Request a meeting with
Stephen's Team

Submit the form below to request a meeting

Table of Contents