Facts:
Analysis – A Remarkable Recovery, a Wobbly Ceasefire, and an Economy That Barely Noticed
Markets have travelled a long way since we last wrote. The fear-driven selling that gripped stocks when combat erupted in Iran bottomed out in late March, and the recovery since has been emphatic – the S&P 500 (C Fund) climbed more than 15% from those lows, carving out a string of new all-time highs along the way. The turn came as Washington repeatedly stepped back from escalation: deadlines for strikes were extended and extended again, a temporary ceasefire took hold in early April, and negotiations toward a permanent deal progressed through the spring. Investors took the repeated walk-backs as a signal that neither side wanted the conflict to spiral, and bought accordingly.
June has been bumpier. By May, the rally had narrowed considerably – fewer and fewer stocks were carrying the advance, with leadership concentrated in AI and semiconductor names. That kind of narrow market is prone to sharp air pockets, and one arrived on June 5th, when Micron’s 13% single-day drop after its enormous 2026 run dragged the NASDAQ down 4.2%. The geopolitical backdrop then darkened: US Central Command struck Iranian military targets on June 10th, Tehran retaliated against Gulf targets, and the Treasury layered fresh sanctions on Iran’s military oil-sales arm. Markets, in the words of one strategist, have shifted from pricing a ceasefire to pricing a “long grind.”
And yet, look at what the economy did during all of this. Employers added 172,000 jobs in May – more than double expectations – with prior months revised higher. Manufacturing activity hit a four-year high. Over 80% of S&P 500 companies beat Q1 earnings estimates. Even oil, the most war-sensitive asset on the planet, fell nearly 19% in May and has stayed below $100 per barrel through the latest escalation. Each new round of strikes is producing smaller and shorter-lived market reactions. Investors are increasingly treating the conflict as a process headed – however erratically – toward resolution, rather than an open-ended catastrophe.
A Tale of Two Inflations
May’s CPI report looks alarming at first glance: 4.2% is the hottest headline reading in over three years. But the composition matters more than the headline. Energy was responsible for more than 60% of the monthly increase, with gasoline alone up 40.5% year-over-year – a direct, mechanical consequence of the Strait of Hormuz disruption. Strip out food and energy and the picture changes entirely: core inflation rose just 0.2% in May, below expectations, and sits at 2.9% annually. Prices for new cars, household furnishings, and car insurance actually declined.
In plain terms: America’s inflation problem right now is an energy problem, and the energy problem is a war problem. That is genuinely painful for consumers at the pump, but it also means the single most effective disinflation policy available isn’t monetary at all – it’s a durable peace deal. With gas prices already drifting lower in early June, several economists believe May may mark the 2026 peak for headline inflation.
A New Hand on the Wheel at the Fed
There has been a changing of the guard since our last report: Kevin Warsh was sworn in as Federal Reserve Chair on May 22nd, succeeding Jerome Powell, who remains on the Board as a governor. The Fed meets June 16-17 – Warsh’s first meeting in the chair – and markets assign roughly a 90% probability to a hold. We agree. In our view, cutting rates with headline inflation above 4% would damage the Fed’s credibility, political pressure from the White House notwithstanding – and notably, market chatter has shifted from “when is the next cut?” to “could the next move be a hike?” We view a hike as unlikely given the softness in core inflation, but the question itself shows how much the energy shock has reshaped expectations. This is also a Summary of Economic Projections meeting, so the updated dot plot will be the first written evidence of where the Warsh-era committee believes rates are heading. Watch for a formal shift from an easing bias to a neutral stance.
Final Thoughts
June’s choppiness has been driven by profit-taking in an over-extended corner of the market and a noisy news cycle – not by deteriorating fundamentals. The underlying evidence remains firmly positive: hiring has reaccelerated, manufacturing is at a four-year high, core inflation is contained, and corporate earnings continue to beat. The swing factor for the second half of 2026 remains energy. A durable resolution with Iran would simultaneously cut headline inflation, lift consumer spending power, and reopen the door to rate cuts – a triple tailwind. Until then, expect continued headline-driven swings, and treat them as what they have been all year: opportunities, not omens.
Choose the portfolio that matches your goals. You will be able define your goals greatly with the TSP Planning Calculator. The Calculator will tell you what Rate of Return you need in your TSP. Once you know what return you need, you will see which portfolio matches that return. For example, “The 5% Portfolio” will target an ANNUAL 5% return. “The 7% Portfolio” will target an ANNUAL 7% return. Etc. In addition to the target rate of return, each portfolio has an expected range of fluctuation, which indicates the level of risk associated with that portfolio. Each month you will see my new allocations for each portfolio. The targeted return will not change, but the allocation and the associated risk needed to yield the targeted return WILL CHANGE EVERY MONTH. As it changes, we will update you with our new allocations that may carry MORE or LESS risk in order to achieve the targeted return. You should ALWAYS REVIEW THE TARGET RETURN IN CONTEXT OF THE RANGE OF FLUCTUATION. You need to be comfortable with BOTH the rate of return & the range of fluctuation. Sometimes you will find that both of the above criteria are met in a single portfolio. That portfolio would be your portfolio of choice for that month. However, sometimes the two criteria don’t land within one portfolio. In such a case you must choose which criterion supersedes the other. If you need help with this, please contact me at stephen@stephenzelcer.com.
When choosing your portfolio you need to consider and be comfortable with BOTH the rate of return & the range of fluctuation. That being said, you have two choices: Either increase your savings rate so you can lower the rate of return needed, or choose the portfolio with the higher return. There’s nothing wrong with choosing a higher rate of return than you need, so long as you are comfortable with the associated risk. You may be pleasantly surprised to find that a more aggressive portfolio carries a range of fluctuation that you are comfortable with. You should ALWAYS REVIEW THE TARGET RETURN IN CONTEXT OF THE RANGE OF FLUCTUATION.
I know some investors misunderstand this service as providing 1-time allocations that last forever. It is far from that. It is designed to keep an eye on market conditions and adjust the portfolios as we encounter new economic strengths or weaknesses. When indicators tell me it’s time to adjust, I adjust and I pass that info along to all my subscribers. Think of it driving a car to a destination, and your GPS is monitoring for traffic, road closures, tolls, delays, alternate routes, etc. This service is the GPS for TSP investors.
Of course! Just because you’re retired doesn’t mean you shouldn’t have goals for your TSP. In fact, many retirees NEED their TSP to produce certain returns in order to remain retired. If you are not clear how much you’ll need your TSP to produce in retirement, you may appreciate my retirement workbook “Ready, Aim, Retire!” This book is available to members.
This is a personal decision. You will certainly want to revisit your goals to make sure they still apply. Perhaps they’ve changed over time. I would say, as a general rule, reviewing your goals once a year is a responsible practice. If you have a life event, that may be grounds to review your goals, too.
In order to figure out if you need an annuity, you need to figure out the rate of distribution from your TSP. Whatever your balance is – whether $100k, $500k, $999k – you will need to figure out your rate of distribution. For example: If you need $10k a year of income, that $10k represents a 10% distribution rate from $100k, 2% of $500k, or about 1% of $999k. If your distribution rate is low enough, you may avoid any need for an annuity. However, above a certain threshold – which I outlined using a documented study – that’s where you have to choose between strategic investing vs. a guaranteed annuity income stream.
The model should be applied to BOTH. This is easy. The whole reallocation process should not take you more than 5 minutes per month. I will even be sending you a “heads up” email at the beginning of each month reminding you to set aside 5 minutes of your time to make your TSP changes when you receive the monthly update.
This means that if you continue saving at the rate you’re saving, you will actually have more than enough money to retire on. In this case you can either decrease your savings rate, or you can plan a more expensive retirement.